The need for reliable data from repeatable tests that can be used by designers for material selection is the main reason why a number of standardized tests have been developed over time to characterise materials.
One such type of test is temperature testing. They are particularly important for understanding and describing the thermal behaviour of polymers, the properties of which can vary markedly with temperature. In these tests, the deformation and softening temperatures of polymeric materials are verified and quantified.
The sample of material to be tested is fixed in the lower part of the instrument where it is immersed in a heated bath. During the test, the temperature of the bath is increased in a controlled manner by a uniform ramp, while an indenter with an area of 1mm2 and a constant load towards the material is placed on the upper surface of the sample.
The indenter will sink into the material and when it reaches a depth of 1 mm, it will correspond to the temperature of the Vicat point of the material under test.
In the image it is possible to see a scheme of the test apparatus with the number 3 highlighting the punch that applies the load to the component, while on the right you can see a test machine with 6 independent stations. The reference standard for this test is ISO 306.
HDT method shows some similarities to the Vicat method as the specimen is placed in a thermostatic bath in this test as well. What changes, however, is the type of specimen, which is usually a prismatic rod, and the manner in which the component is stressed, as it is tested in flexion, with a constant applied force. The HDT temperature is reached when the deformation of the specimen exceeds 0.2% deflection.
In the picture we can see a specimen during the test (left) and at the end of the test (right) after a deformation of 0.25 mm. There are 3 different tests called A - B - C according to the loads to which the sample is subjected, respectively 1.8 MPa - 0.8 MPa - 8 MPa. The reference standard for this test is ISO 75. This test provides us with important information to identify the usable temperatures for a given material and also allows us to compare different materials in a direct and repeatable way.
The behaviour of a given material at different temperatures is extremely important for determining how to realise a design. That is why in Weerg, by testing all our materials, we have unique data which represents a performance benchmark between different materials. You can view the comparative material tables here.
If you still have doubts, questions or need additional information, our experts are available to support you in your choice: contact them here to discuss your project and your doubts about the material.
7 min read
Weerg staff: Apr 28, 2026
If you are an engineer tasked with choosing between SLA and FDM, avoid comparisons based on opinions. This guide is founded on concrete data:...
5 min read
Weerg staff: Apr 21, 2026
If you think of SLA resin, you probably picture small translucent models, aesthetic prototypes, or display miniatures. It's a widespread perception —...
5 min read
Weerg staff: Apr 14, 2026
The galvanisation of an SLA resin print triples its breaking load, quadruples its stiffness, and improves flexural resistance by nearly 10 times....
Fabio Trotti